Skip to main content

Make Our Code More Testable with Proxy Design Pattern


If you heard about the term separation of concerns, you could agree this concept is very important for making a system "clean". One of the most important characteristics of a clean system is testable.

Let me tell you my story about how I've just come acrosss the design pattern Proxy.

Note: to get started, you can find a very simple example of the pattern Proxy here. 

Let's start!

I have an interface as below:
public interface DocumentGenerator {
    File generate(Document document) throws BusinessException;
}

The following is my first implementation for a concrete class of DocumentGenerator.
public class DocumentGeneratorImpl implements DocumentGenerator {
 private Dossier dossier;
 private Locale locale;
 
 public DocumentGeneratorImpl(Dossier dossier, Locale locale) {
  validateNotNullParams(dossier, locale);
  this.dossier = dossier;
  this.locale = locale;
 }
 
 private void validateNotNullParams(LibertyDossier dossier, Locale locale) {
  if(Objects.isNull(dossier)) {
   throw new IllegalArgumentException("Dossier must not be null!");
  }
  
  if(Objects.isNull(dossier.getDossierType())){
   throw new IllegalArgumentException("Dossier type must not be null!");
  }
  
  if(Objects.isNull(locale)) {
   throw new IllegalArgumentException("Locale must be defined!");
  }
 }
 
 @Override
 public File generate(Document document, boolean temporary) 
  throws BusinessException {
  setCobIdForDossierIfNotExist();
  switch (dossier.getDossierType()) {
  case TYPE_A:
   // Do some logic here in case TYPE_A
  case TYPE_BA:
   // Do some logic here in case TYPE_B
  default:
   throw new BusinessException("Not supported dossier type");
  }
 }
 
 private void setCobIdForDossierIfNotExist() {
  if(StringUtils.isEmpty(dossier.getCobId())) {
   String generatedCobId = DossierService.getInstance().generateCobId();
   dossier.setCobId(generatedCobId);
  }
 }
}

The client code constructs the concrete class DocumentGeneratorImpl.
DocumentGenerator  generator = new DocumentGeneratorImpl(dossier, locale);

I saw that some private methods "validateNotNullParams(dossier, locale)" and "setCobIdForDossierIfNotExist()" are just a second responsibility of class DocumentGeneratorImpl.

Follow "S" of SOLID  - Single Responsibility

Firstly, I was thinking about how to separate these methods into another class. Then, I create a class called DocumentGeneratorHelper which contains to these methods. It was just improved a bit.

public class DocumentGeneratorImpl implements DocumentGenerator {
 private Dossier dossier;
 private Locale locale;
 
 public DocumentGeneratorImpl(Dossier dossier, Locale locale) {
  DocumentGeneratorHelper.validateNotNullParams(dossier, locale);
  this.dossier = dossier;
  this.locale = locale;
 }
 
 @Override
 public File generate(Document document, boolean temporary) 
   throws BusinessException {
  DocumentGeneratorHelper.setCobIdForDossierIfNotExist();
  switch (dossier.getDossierType()) {
  case TYPE_A:
   // Do some logic here in case TYPE_A
  case TYPE_BA:
   // Do some logic here in case TYPE_B
  default:
   throw new BusinessException("Not supported dossier type");
  }
 }
 
}

However, if I create tests for DocumentGeneratorImpl, I need to mock DocumentGeneratorHelper. Huh....! Any better approach?

I was thinking about that it is somehow I need to apply an Aspect-Oriented Programming (AOP) approach. As my google searching result, there are some approaches but they are quite complicated and heavy. They use Java Proxy or AOP Frameworks such as AspectJ.

A Simple AOP Approach

Fortunately, the keyword "proxy" leads me to the pattern Proxy. The idea of Proxy is really simple and cool!



Okay, now I create a Proxy instead of a Helper as before.

public class DocumentGeneratorProxy implements DocumentGenerator{
 private DocumentGenerator generator;
 private Dossier dossier;
 
 public DocumentGeneratorProxy(Dossier dossier, Locale locale) {
  validateNotNullParams(dossier, locale);
  this.dossier = dossier;
  this.generator = new DocumentGenerator(this.dossier, locale);
 }

 private void validateNotNullParams(Dossier dossier, Locale locale) {
  if(Objects.isNull(dossier)) {
   throw new IllegalArgumentException("Dossier must not be null!");
  }
  
  if(Objects.isNull(dossier.getDossierType())){
   throw new IllegalArgumentException("Dossier type must not be null!");
  }
  
  if(Objects.isNull(locale)) {
   throw new IllegalArgumentException("Locale must be defined!");
  }
 }

 @Override
 public File generate(Document document, boolean temporary)
   throws BusinessException {
  setCobIdForDossierIfNotExist();
  return generator.generate(document, temporary);
 }

 private void setCobIdForDossierIfNotExist() {
  if(StringUtils.isEmpty(dossier.getCobId())) {
   String generatedCobId = DossierService.getInstance().generateCobId();
   dossier.setCobId(generatedCobId);
  }
 }

}

Done! DocumentGeneratorImpl  doesn't contain its second responsibilities anymore. These methods are tested by the Proxy and we don't need to mock in DocumentGeneratorImpl.
the public class DocumentGeneratorImpl implements DocumentGenerator {
 private Dossier dossier;
 private Locale locale;
 
 public LibertyDocumentGenerator(Dossier dossier, Locale locale) {
  this.dossier = dossier;
  this.locale = locale;
 }
 
 @Override
 public File generate(Document document, boolean temporary) 
   throws BusinessException {
  switch (dossier.getDossierType()) {
  case TYPE_A:
   // Do some logic here in case TYPE_A
  case TYPE_BA:
   // Do some logic here in case TYPE_B
  default:
   throw new BusinessException("Not supported dossier type");
  }
 }
 
}

So, instead of calling directly DocumentGeneratorImpl, we call DocumentGeneratorProxy in the client code as below:

DocumentGenerator  generator = new DocumentGeneratorProxy(dossier, locale);

Happy codings!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

My must-have apps for daily work

There is no doubt that cool apps can help us be more productive and enjoyable at work. For the time being, I really love the following apps which are used by me almost every day. 1. A personal Kanban In fact, a personal kanban is the most useful app for me. Why does it matter? It is not just a to-do list, but it keeps me motivated every day because it helps me be able to know what my "big picture" is. I usually set up my plans together with a path to reach them.  KanbanFlow  is my preferred tool. KanbanFlow 2. A terminal Needless to say, a terminal is a must-have app for every developer, especially the ones use macOS/Linux. Due to its importance, I love to decorate and enhance it to be super exciting with various tools such as  iTerm ,  oh-my- zsh , and  thefuck . ;) iTerm + oh-my-zsh 3. A documentation "ecosystem" As a developer, I can not remember all things that I have experimented a day. Moreover, a document is really useful for sharing an...

Regex - Check a text without special characters but German, French

Special characters such as square brackets ([ ]) can cause an exception " java.util.regex.PatternSyntaxException " or something like this if we don't handle them correctly. I had met this issue. In my case, my customers want our application should allow some characters in German and French even not allow some special characters. The solution is that we limit the allowed characters by showing the validation message on GUI. For an instance, the message looks like the following: "This field can't contain any special characters; only letters, numbers, underscores (_), spaces and single quotes (') are allowed." I used Regular Expression to check it. For entering Germany and French, I actually don't have this type of keyboard, so I referred these sites: * German characters: http://german.typeit.org/ * French characters: http://french.typeit.org/ Here is my code: package vn.nvanhuong.practice; import java.util.regex.Matcher; import java.util...

Changing source code at run-time with Service Locator pattern

I have a service to get some data but the result can be different basing on where the implementation is. Technically, I have two or more concrete implementation of an interface and I am able to switch using these concrete classes at run-time. That means I have a place to configure it without re-deploying the application. In order to overcome this issue, I use Service Locator design pattern and here I only care about two advantages below: Encapsulating the specific implementation, we just declare the name and don't care about the implementation of the service. Changing the implementation at run-time. Client : an object that invokes the services via Service Locator Business services : services that is used by Client.

My 2017 Review

Passion for System Design After finishing a one year project, my longest stable team (lasted for 3 years) was separated into two smaller teams. Sadly, but that was a good chance for me to become a key member in my new team. My preferred skills were about system architectures; therefore most of the tasks of building the application structures were handled by me. In order to enhance my design system skills, I have spent much my time for reading books closely after work. These following books help me a lot. - Object-Oriented Thought Process | Matt Weisfeld - Head First Design Pattern  | Elisabeth Freeman and Kathy Sierra - Java 8 in Action: Lambdas, Streams, and Functional-style Programming | Alan Mycroft and Mario Fusco Junior Technical Architect I was requested to join a technical architect team (aka Team. Alpha) where I actually had gained experiences almost on interviewing candidates for my company (lol). Besides, I noticed myself must improve the skills of convinci...

The culture war at the heart of open source

I enjoyed reading this post: https://words.steveklabnik.com/the-culture-war-at-the-heart-of-open-source Here is my highlight: If you ask a random developer what “open source” means to them, you won’t often hear “software that follows the Open Source Definition.” If you ask them “what’s the difference between free software and open source software,” you’ll often hear “aren’t those the same thing?” or “you can charge money for open source software, it’s not always free.” You may even hear “it’s on GitHub.” In brief, there was a man Richard Stallman (and his team) starting a project called "GNU Project" in 1983. This project was about to develop a free software system. The term "free" here meant "freedom", not only about the price. The Free Software Foundation appeared to support this project. But then, the term "free software" was so ambiguous. "In addition, the ambiguity of the term “free software” was seen as discouraging busine...