Skip to main content

Separate Constructing a System from Using It


In the real world, in order to use a building (hotel, supermarket, etc) we need to construct it first. This concern should be applied for software development as well.

Step by step, I would like to show you the issue about no separation of constructing and using it and then I'll give you some approaches to overcome this issue.

| Note: you can find the below demonstrated code here  

Take a Look the Following Simple Application

Used tools and technologies: Eclipse (Mars), JDK 1.8

I had an App which uses Controller. Controller uses Service (an interface). Finally, Service has one concrete class is DefaultService.
//package vn.nvanhuong.system.separationconstructing;
public class App {
 public static void main(String[] args) {
  Controller controller = new Controller();
  controller.doAction();
 }
}

public class Controller {
 private Service service;
 
 public void doAction(){
  System.out.println("doAction in Controller");
  getService().execute();
 }
 
 public Service getService(){
  if(service == null){
   service = new DefaultService();
  }
  return service;
 }
}

public interface Service {
 void execute();
}

public class DefaultService implements Service {

 @Override
 public void execute() {
  System.out.println("executing Default Service");
 }

}

Do you find any issue?

Okay. Now, we just pay attention on this piece of code.
public Service getService(){
 if(service == null){
  service = new DefaultService();
 }
 return service;
}

Have you ever thought that we might meet at least three following issues?
  • Compile error: if Controller could not find DefaultService.
  • Testing: if we want to test Controller, we need to mock DefaultService in case it is a heavyweight object
  • Right object: if Service has more concrete classes, DefaultService will not be always a desired object in all cases.
The root cause is that we had a hard-coded "DefaultService" as a dependency of Controller.

How to solve?

The problem is the solution! Instead, we construct the instance of Service at Controller, we move this code of constructing into another place. Yeah!

There are three approaches.

Separation of Main - Separating the constructing into "main"

//package vn.nvanhuong.system.separationconstructing.main;

public class App {
 public static void main(String[] args) {
  Service service = new DefaultService();
  Controller controller = new Controller(service);
  controller.doAction();
 }
}

public class Controller {
 private Service service;

 public Controller(Service service) {
  this.service = service;
 }

 public void doAction() {
  System.out.println("doAction in Controller");
  service.execute();
 }
}

Factories - Using design pattern "Abstract Factory"

We move the constructing into a place separating from the application code.

//package vn.nvanhuong.system.separationconstructing.factory;

public class App {
 public static void main(String[] args) {
  ServiceFactory factory = new ServiceFactory();
  Service service = factory.getService(ServiceName.CUSTOM);
  Controller controller = new Controller(service);
  controller.doAction();
 }
}

public class ServiceFactory {

 public Service getService(ServiceName serviceName) {
  if (Objects.isNull(serviceName)) {
   throw new IllegalArgumentException("service name must not be null");
  }

  switch (serviceName) {
  case DEFAULT:
   return new DefaultService();
  case CUSTOM:
   return new CustomService();
  default:
   return null;
  }
 }

}

public enum ServiceName {
 DEFAULT, CUSTOM
}

public class CustomService implements Service {

 @Override
 public void execute() {
  System.out.println("executing from Custom Service");

 }

}

public class Controller {
 private Service service;

 public Controller(Service service) {
  this.service = service;
 }

 public void doAction() {
  System.out.println("doAction in Controller");
  service.execute();
 }
}

Dependency Injection

We move the second reposibility of object Controller (constructing Service) into another object. Moreover, DI helps us solve dependencies passively.

I used Google Guice for this demonstration. Because I still wanted to use a Java project (in Eclipse) instead of Maven project so that I simply found needed jars on Maven Repository and included them into project's buildpath. They are "guice-3.0.jar", "cglib-2.2.1.jar", "javax.inject-1.jar" and ''aopalliance-1.0.jar".

//package vn.nvanhuong.system.separationconstructing.di;

public class App {
 public static void main(String[] args) {
  Injector injector = Guice.createInjector(new AppInjector());
  Controller controller = injector.getInstance(Controller.class);
  controller.doAction();
 }
}

public class AppInjector extends AbstractModule {

 @Override
 protected void configure() {
  bind(Service.class).to(CustomService.class);
 }

}

public class Controller {
 private Service service;

 public void doAction() {
  System.out.println("doAction in Controller");
  service.execute();
 }

 @Inject
 public void setService(Service service) {
  this.service = service;
 }
}

How do you think about the issues and solutions? Leave your comments down below. :)

--------------
References:

[1]. Robert C. Martin, Clean Code - A Handbook of Agile Software Craftsmanship, Chapter 11, Systems.
[2]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abstract_factory_pattern
[3]. http://www.journaldev.com/2403/google-guice-dependency-injection-example-tutorial

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Styling Sort Icons Using Font Awesome for Primefaces' Data Table

So far, Primefaces has used image sprites for displaying the sort icons. This leads to a problem if we want to make a different style for these icons; for example, I would make the icon "arrow up" more blurry at the first time the table loading because I want to highlight the icon "arrow down". I found a way that I can replace these icons with Font Awesome icons. We will use "CSS Pseudo-classes" to achieve it. The hardest thing here is that we should handle displaying icons in different cases. There is a case both "arrow up" and "arrow down" showing and other case is only one of these icons is shown. .ui-sortable-column-icon.ui-icon.ui-icon-carat-2-n-s { background-image: none; margin-left: 5px; font-size: 1.1666em; position: relative; } .ui-sortable-column-icon.ui-icon.ui-icon-carat-2-n-s:not(.ui-icon-triangle-1-s)::before { content: "\f106"; font-family: "FontAwesome"; position: ...

[Snippet] CSS - Child element overlap parent

I searched from somewhere and found that a lot of people says a basic concept for implementing this feature looks like below: HTML code: <div id="parent">  <div id="child">  </div> </div> And, CSS: #parent{   position: relative;   overflow:hidden; } #child{   position: absolute;   top: -1;   right: -1px; } However, I had a lot of grand-parents in my case and the above code didn't work. Therefore, I needed an alternative. I presumed that my app uses Boostrap and AngularJs, maybe some CSS from them affects mine. I didn't know exactly the problem, but I believed when all CSS is loaded into my browser, I could completely handle it. www.tom-collinson.com I tried to create an example to investigated this problem by Fiddle . Accidentally, I just changed: position: parent; to position: static; for one of parents -> the problem is solved. Look at my code: <div class="modal-body dn-placeholder-parent-positi...

Strategy Design Pattern

For example, I have a program with an Animal abstract class and two sub-classes Dog and Bird. I want to add new behavior for the class Animal, this is "fly".  Now, I face two approaches to solve this issue: 1. Adding an abstract method "fly" into the class Animal. Then, I force the sub-classes should be implemented this method, something like: public abstract class Animal{ //bla bla public abstract void fly(); } public class Bird extends Animal{ //bla bla public void fly(){ System.out.println("Fly high"); } } public class Dog extends Animal{ //bla bla public void fly(){ System.out.println("Cant fly"); } } 2. Creating an interface with method "fly" inside. The same issue to an abstract class, I force the classes these implement this interface should have a method "fly" inside: public interface Flyable{ public void fly(); } public class Bird implements Flyable{ //bla bla public void fly(){ System.out.pr...

Junit - Test fails on French or German string assertion

In my previous post about building a regex to check a text without special characters but allow German and French . I met a problem that the unit test works fine on my machine using Eclipse, but it was fail when running on Jenkins' build job. Here is my test: @Test public void shouldAllowFrenchAndGermanCharacters(){ String source = "ÄäÖöÜüß áÁàÀâÂéÉèÈêÊîÎçÇ"; assertFalse(SpecialCharactersUtils.isExistSpecialCharater(source)); } Production code: public static boolean isExistNotAllowedCharacters(String source){ Pattern regex = Pattern.compile("^[a-zA-Z_0-9_ÄäÖöÜüß áÁàÀâÂéÉèÈêÊîÎçÇ]*$"); Matcher matcher = regex.matcher(source); return !matcher.matches(); } The result likes the following: Failed tests: SpecialCharactersUtilsTest.shouldAllowFrenchAndGermanCharacters:32 null A guy from stackoverflow.com says: "This is probably due to the default encoding used for your Java source files. The ö in the string literal in the J...

Only allow input number value with autoNumeric.js

autoNumeric is a jQuery plugin that automatically formats currency and numbers as you type on form inputs. I used autoNumeric 1.9.21 for demo code. 1. Dowload autoNumeric.js file from  https://github.com/BobKnothe/autoNumeric 2. Import to project <script src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.11.0/jquery.min.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="js/autoNumeric.js"></script> 3. Define a function to use it <script type="text/javascript"> /* only number is accepted */ function txtNumberOnly_Mask() { var inputOrgNumber = $("#numberTxt"); inputOrgNumber.each(function() { $(this).autoNumeric({ aSep : '', aDec: '.', vMin : '0.00' }); }); } </script> 4. Call the function by event <form> <input type="text" value="" id="numberTxt"/>(only number) </form> <script ty...