Skip to main content

Changing source code at run-time with Service Locator pattern

I have a service to get some data but the result can be different basing on where the implementation is. Technically, I have two or more concrete implementation of an interface and I am able to switch using these concrete classes at run-time. That means I have a place to configure it without re-deploying the application. In order to overcome this issue, I use Service Locator design pattern and here I only care about two advantages below:
  • Encapsulating the specific implementation, we just declare the name and don't care about the implementation of the service.
  • Changing the implementation at run-time.



Client: an object that invokes the services via Service Locator
Business services: services that is used by Client.


Once again, I used the JFS Helloworld example from previous post for this example.

1. Create a service interface "CountryService" and two concrete classes "CountryService1" and "CountryService2" (Business services)

package vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator.service;

import java.util.List;

public interface CountryService{
 public List<String> getCountries();
}

The first concrete service:
package vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator.service.impl;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;

import vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator.service.CountryService;

public class CountryService1 implements CountryService{

 public List<String> getCountries() {
  List<String> result = new ArrayList<String>();
  result.add("Vietname");
  result.add("Switzerland");
  result.add("Japan");
  return result;
 }

}

The second concrete service:
package vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator.service.impl;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;

import vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator.service.CountryService;

public class CountryService2 implements CountryService{

 public List<String> getCountries() {
  List<String> result = new ArrayList<String>();
  result.add("Vietname");
  result.add("America");
  result.add("China");
  return result;
 }

}

2. Create class "InitialContext" that is used for looking up and creating classes basing on the provided names
package vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator;

import java.lang.reflect.Constructor;

public class IntitialContext {
 
 public Object lookup(String serviceName){
    
  if(serviceName != null){
   try {
    Class<?> clazz = Class.forName(serviceName);
    Constructor<?> ctor = clazz.getConstructor();
    Object object = ctor.newInstance();
    return object;
   } catch (Exception ex) {
    ex.printStackTrace();
   } 
  }
  return null;
 }

}


3. Create class "ServiceLocator", I used Singleton to cache the object.
package vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator;

public class ServiceLocator {
 private static ServiceLocator instance;
 
 private ServiceLocator(){}
 
 public static synchronized ServiceLocator getInstance(){
  if(instance == null){
   return new ServiceLocator();
  }
  return instance;
 }

 public Object getService(String serviceName) {
  IntitialContext initialContext = new IntitialContext();
  return initialContext.lookup(serviceName);
 }

}

4. Create a resource file "services.properties" in order to configure the changing implementation at run-time. :)
country = vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator.service.impl.CountryService1
language = vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator.service.impl.LanguageService1

5. Calling SeviceLocator in Managed bean (Client)
package vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator.bean;

import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Properties;

import javax.faces.bean.ManagedBean;

import vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator.ServiceLocator;
import vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator.service.CountryService;

@ManagedBean(name = "helloBean")
public class HelloBean {
 private List<String> countries;
 
 public HelloBean() throws IOException {
  Properties prop = new Properties();
     InputStream input = null;
     
     String filename = "services.properties";
  input = HelloBean.class.getClassLoader().getResourceAsStream(filename);

  prop.load(input);
  CountryService countryService = (CountryService) ServiceLocator.getInstance()
              .getService(prop.getProperty("country"));
        this.countries = countryService.getCountries();
  
 }

 public List<String> getCountries() {
  return countries;
 }

 public void setCountries(List<String> countries) {
  this.countries = countries;
 }
 
}
6. GUI code: index.xhtml
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
 xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core"
 xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html"
 xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets">
<h:head>
 <title>Service Locator</title>
</h:head>
<h:body>
 <h3>Lis of countries:</h3>
 <h:dataTable value="#{helloBean.countries}" var="country">
   <h:column>
         <h:outputText value="#{country}" />
     </h:column>
 </h:dataTable>

</h:body>
</html>

7. Test (on Tomcat v7.0)

http://localhost:8080/service_locator/

Use the "CountryService1" by changing in "services.properties", don't need to restart the server.

country = vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator.service.impl.CountryService1




Use the "CountryService2" by changing in "services.properties", don't need to restart the server.

country = vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator.service.impl.CountryService2

Here we also can add more concrete classes of CountryService and just declare in file "services.properties" for using. For this reason, I use Java Reflection to create the objects basing on the provided names in general way otherwise we have to change the InitialContext whenever we want to add new concrete class of "CountryService".

Note:
There might have several ways to implement this pattern but the idea is general so that my example is only a case. We also can improve my implementation by using caching technique, see reference [3].


Reference:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Set up a web server for learning HTTP headers

Motivation We all follow the client-server model using the HTTP protocol for most of our web apps today. In development, we simply may have a backend API server and a frontend (web pages or mobile apps) only. However, it seemed that a proxy server is always required for production. In fact, most of the hardest issues in production come from integration. The requests and responses might be modified by the proxy server. Therefore, the understanding of HTTP protocol is one of the key skills to resolve those issues. I wanted to dive deep into HTTP with some core concepts such as caching, cookies, and CORS. I didn't intend to go quickly rather than moved slowly to have a well understanding of what I do. Prepare a server The easiest way is to use my laptop as a server then I can just use "localhost". I can also use ngrok to make my web server online. Finally, I use an online tool such as RedBot to check the HTTP headers. To make it more excited though, I deployed the app on A...

What the heck is Meteor DDP?

I was using Meteor for my messenger project. I was so curious about the real time connection. I wanted to know how exactly this mechanism works. In this post, I will go through the DDP Specification, an overview of WebSocket, and a simple demo about how to subscribe a publication of Rocket.Chat (containing a DDP server) from an external webpage. At a glance, I knew that Meteor invented a protocol called DDP which uses for handling real time connection. So then, what is DDP? "DDP (Distributed Data Protocol) is the stateful WebSocket protocol that Meteor uses to communicate between the client and the server." [1] All right! Why does DDP matter? "DDP is a standard way to solve the biggest problem facing client-side JavaScript developers: querying a server-side database, sending the results down to the client, and then pushing changes to the client whenever anything changes in the database" . [2] In order to understand deeply the protocol, I decided ...

MS SQL Server Views

"Creates a virtual table whose contents (columns and rows) are defined by a query. Use this statement to create a view of the data in one or more tables in the database. For example, a view can be used for the following purposes: - To focus, simplify, and customize the perception each user has of the database. - As a security mechanism by allowing users to access data through the view, without granting the users permissions to directly access the underlying base tables. - To provide a backward compatible interface to emulate a table whose schema has changed." [1] Beside that, our team used view in order to improve the performance of our web apps when a database has a very complicated relationship between its tables by using ORM Frameworks such as Hibernate. Example code: --create CREATE VIEW placeholders AS SELECT EMPKEY AS empkey, CONNUMB AS connumb, EMPNBR AS empNbr, ACEEMPN AS empFirstName, ACEEMPFN AS empLastName, EMPNAM AS empFullName, ...

PSMDB - A MongoDB alternative for having Encryption At Rest

Encryption is the most popular tool for securing data both in transit and at rest. - For protecting data in transit, we can configure to use the TLS connection - For protecting data at rest, we can use Percona Server for MongoDB (PSMDB), an open-source alternative for MongoDB Enterprise. License PSMDB Docker images follow the SSPL license. Therefore, it is not a problem when I only have my containers deployed in on-premises environments. Running MongoDB Replication on OpenShift I have successfully installed the replication by following the guide Install Percona Server for MongoDB on OpenShift . In order to make it work properly with my needs, I disabled some features from the default deployment. See the detail in this change Basically, I needed to create a CRD (Custom Resource Definition) to let OpenShift/Kubernetes what PSMDB is. Then, I deployed the Operator pod. Finally, I deployed the PSMDB StatefulSet. I used NFS shares for Persistent Volumes. Create CRD for PSMDB 2 git clone http...

The power of acceptance test

User Story is the place PO gives his ideas about features so that developers are able to know what requirements are. Acceptance tests are these show the most valuable things of the features represented by some specific cases. Usually PO defines them, but not always. Therefore, refining existing acceptance tests – even defining new ones that cover all features of the User Story must be a worth task. Acceptance test with Given When Then pattern If we understand what we are going to do, we can complete it by 50% I have worked with some members those just start implementing the features one by one and from top to down of the User Story description. Be honest, I am the one used to be. What a risky approach! Because it might meet a case that is very easy to miss requirements or needs to re-work after finding any misunderstood things. I have also worked with some members those accept spending a long time to clarify the User Story. Reading carefully of whole User Story by defining...