Skip to main content

Changing source code at run-time with Service Locator pattern

I have a service to get some data but the result can be different basing on where the implementation is. Technically, I have two or more concrete implementation of an interface and I am able to switch using these concrete classes at run-time. That means I have a place to configure it without re-deploying the application. In order to overcome this issue, I use Service Locator design pattern and here I only care about two advantages below:
  • Encapsulating the specific implementation, we just declare the name and don't care about the implementation of the service.
  • Changing the implementation at run-time.



Client: an object that invokes the services via Service Locator
Business services: services that is used by Client.


Once again, I used the JFS Helloworld example from previous post for this example.

1. Create a service interface "CountryService" and two concrete classes "CountryService1" and "CountryService2" (Business services)

package vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator.service;

import java.util.List;

public interface CountryService{
 public List<String> getCountries();
}

The first concrete service:
package vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator.service.impl;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;

import vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator.service.CountryService;

public class CountryService1 implements CountryService{

 public List<String> getCountries() {
  List<String> result = new ArrayList<String>();
  result.add("Vietname");
  result.add("Switzerland");
  result.add("Japan");
  return result;
 }

}

The second concrete service:
package vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator.service.impl;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;

import vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator.service.CountryService;

public class CountryService2 implements CountryService{

 public List<String> getCountries() {
  List<String> result = new ArrayList<String>();
  result.add("Vietname");
  result.add("America");
  result.add("China");
  return result;
 }

}

2. Create class "InitialContext" that is used for looking up and creating classes basing on the provided names
package vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator;

import java.lang.reflect.Constructor;

public class IntitialContext {
 
 public Object lookup(String serviceName){
    
  if(serviceName != null){
   try {
    Class<?> clazz = Class.forName(serviceName);
    Constructor<?> ctor = clazz.getConstructor();
    Object object = ctor.newInstance();
    return object;
   } catch (Exception ex) {
    ex.printStackTrace();
   } 
  }
  return null;
 }

}


3. Create class "ServiceLocator", I used Singleton to cache the object.
package vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator;

public class ServiceLocator {
 private static ServiceLocator instance;
 
 private ServiceLocator(){}
 
 public static synchronized ServiceLocator getInstance(){
  if(instance == null){
   return new ServiceLocator();
  }
  return instance;
 }

 public Object getService(String serviceName) {
  IntitialContext initialContext = new IntitialContext();
  return initialContext.lookup(serviceName);
 }

}

4. Create a resource file "services.properties" in order to configure the changing implementation at run-time. :)
country = vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator.service.impl.CountryService1
language = vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator.service.impl.LanguageService1

5. Calling SeviceLocator in Managed bean (Client)
package vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator.bean;

import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Properties;

import javax.faces.bean.ManagedBean;

import vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator.ServiceLocator;
import vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator.service.CountryService;

@ManagedBean(name = "helloBean")
public class HelloBean {
 private List<String> countries;
 
 public HelloBean() throws IOException {
  Properties prop = new Properties();
     InputStream input = null;
     
     String filename = "services.properties";
  input = HelloBean.class.getClassLoader().getResourceAsStream(filename);

  prop.load(input);
  CountryService countryService = (CountryService) ServiceLocator.getInstance()
              .getService(prop.getProperty("country"));
        this.countries = countryService.getCountries();
  
 }

 public List<String> getCountries() {
  return countries;
 }

 public void setCountries(List<String> countries) {
  this.countries = countries;
 }
 
}
6. GUI code: index.xhtml
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
 xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core"
 xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html"
 xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets">
<h:head>
 <title>Service Locator</title>
</h:head>
<h:body>
 <h3>Lis of countries:</h3>
 <h:dataTable value="#{helloBean.countries}" var="country">
   <h:column>
         <h:outputText value="#{country}" />
     </h:column>
 </h:dataTable>

</h:body>
</html>

7. Test (on Tomcat v7.0)

http://localhost:8080/service_locator/

Use the "CountryService1" by changing in "services.properties", don't need to restart the server.

country = vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator.service.impl.CountryService1




Use the "CountryService2" by changing in "services.properties", don't need to restart the server.

country = vn.nvanhuong.servicelocator.service.impl.CountryService2

Here we also can add more concrete classes of CountryService and just declare in file "services.properties" for using. For this reason, I use Java Reflection to create the objects basing on the provided names in general way otherwise we have to change the InitialContext whenever we want to add new concrete class of "CountryService".

Note:
There might have several ways to implement this pattern but the idea is general so that my example is only a case. We also can improve my implementation by using caching technique, see reference [3].


Reference:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

JSF 2 - Dynamically manipulating the component tree with system events

Let's suppose we want to modify the metadata (attributes)  of elements such as render , requried , maxlength but we do not define in JSF tags. The manipulating components can be conducted in Drools  files, for example. How could we do? I think that is what we need to change something of component tree during JSF life-cycle. JSF supports event handling throughout the JSF life-cycle. In this post, I use two events: postAddToView for scanning components tree and preRenderView for manipulating the meta of components before rendering to GUI. I modified my own project from previous post for this example. This is my first further JSF trying out with the project as I said before. :) We define the tags f:event below the form - a container component of the components which we want to work on. The valid values for the attribute type for f:event can be found from tag library document  of JSF 2. <!DOCTYPE html> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" x...

Styling Sort Icons Using Font Awesome for Primefaces' Data Table

So far, Primefaces has used image sprites for displaying the sort icons. This leads to a problem if we want to make a different style for these icons; for example, I would make the icon "arrow up" more blurry at the first time the table loading because I want to highlight the icon "arrow down". I found a way that I can replace these icons with Font Awesome icons. We will use "CSS Pseudo-classes" to achieve it. The hardest thing here is that we should handle displaying icons in different cases. There is a case both "arrow up" and "arrow down" showing and other case is only one of these icons is shown. .ui-sortable-column-icon.ui-icon.ui-icon-carat-2-n-s { background-image: none; margin-left: 5px; font-size: 1.1666em; position: relative; } .ui-sortable-column-icon.ui-icon.ui-icon-carat-2-n-s:not(.ui-icon-triangle-1-s)::before { content: "\f106"; font-family: "FontAwesome"; position: ...

If We Want to Go Fast, We Need to Go Well

Have you ever thought that we won't need to code anymore because programs might be generated from specification? The answer can be yes or no; there is still arguing about it. The programming language is more and more closed to the requirements. The starting is from a very low level as Assembly to a very high level like Python. However, it doesn't make much sense when saying that we will eliminate coding. For me, we currently still need to express our ideas in exact words that tells the machine what we want. Otherwise, I hope in the future the machine is intelligent enough to understand our requirements directly from our words. ;) Take a look at the famous quote of Robert C.Martin about what I mentioned above: "Remember that code is really the language in which we ultimately express the requirements. We may create languages that are closer to the requirements. We may create tools that help us parse and assemble those requirements into formal structures. But we wi...

BIRT - Fix the size of an image

I use a dynamic image as a logo my report in pdf. At the beginning, I use table to align the logo in left or right. I meet a problem with some images with a large width or height. My customer requires that the logo should be displayed in original size. These following steps solves my problem: 1. Use Grid instead of Table 2. Set Grid "Height" is 100%  and "Width" is blank 3. Set "Fit to container" for images are "true". Download the the template here .

JSF, Primefaces - Invoking Application Code Even When Validation Failed

A use case I have a form which has requirements as follow: - There are some mandatory fields. - Validation is triggered when changing value on each field. - A button "Next" is enable only when all fields are entered. It turns to disabled if any field is empty. My first approach I defined a variable "isDisableNext" at a backend bean "Controller" for dynamically disabling/enabling the "Next" button by performing event "onValueChange", but, it had a problem: <h:form id="personForm"> <p:outputLabel value="First Name" for="firstName"/> <p:inputText id="firstName" value="#{person.firstName}" required="true"> <p:ajax event="change" listener="#{controller.onValueChange}" update="nextButton"/> </p:inputText> <p:outputLabel value="Last Name" for="lastName"/> <p:i...