Skip to main content

Small Changes to Java 7 via Project Coin and Why They are Useful


Did you know how new features were added into Java 7? The following are functionalities that can be considered.
Source: [1]
Project Coin is all about the changes in the range from syntactic sugar to new language feature. This is what we're talking about today.

Since Java 7 is the first version developed in an open source manner, there is an amount of actions that must be performed for any changes as follows:
  • Update the Java Language Specification (JSL)
  • Implement a prototype in the source compiler
  • Add library support essential for the change
  • Write tests and examples
  • Update document
  • Etc, ...
Project Coin has submitted a lot of proposals (almost 70) but only some of them are chosen to Java 7. Why? Briefly, Java is a rich static type system and it has a lot of possible interaction points between different bits of it. Making changes to this type system is prone to creating unexpected surprises.

Wow! It is tough, right? Let's take a look what features Project Coin brought to Java 7.

Strings in switch statement

Question: Why do we need "switch"? (already supported by prior Java 7)
Answer: To avoid lots of ugly nested "ifs".
Question: Why do we need "string" in "switch"?
Answer: Just to make life in Java 7 a little bit easier. Agree?

Enhanced syntax for numeric literals

Underscores in numbers to improve readability.
E.g: 100_000_000 and 10_000_000 are much more readable than 100000000 and 10000000.

Improved exception handling

- Multicatch: it groups a family of exceptions into one catch statement; this feature can reduce code duplication.
- Final rethrow: it won't force to declare the exception signature. For example, my IDE complains of the block below with Java 6 compiler, but Java 7.

However, the issue here is the real dynamic type of the exception has been swallowed if we declare the exception signature.
And, the change in Java 7 is just simple as follows:

try {
  doSomethingWhichMightThrowIOException();
  doSomethingElseWhichMightThrowSQLException();
} catch (final Exception e) {
  //...
  throw e;
}

Why is final keyword useful? Because it provides a new semantics of catch and rethrow. The appearance of the final keyword indicates that the type that’s actually thrown is the runtime type of the exception that was encountered.

Note: If a catch block handles more than one exception type, then the catch parameter is implicitly final.

Try-with-resources

#Funfact: Virtually no one gets manual resource closing 100 percent right.
Therefore, using try-with-resources to eliminate unnecessary bugs from your codebase.

try(OutputStream out = new FileOutputStream(file);
InputStream is = url.openStream()){
 byte[] buf = new byte[4096];
 int len;
 while ((len = is.read(buf)) > 0) {
  out.write(buf, 0, len);
 }
}

Diamond syntax

To avoid the definition and setup of instances can be really verbose.
#Funfact: Why "diamond syntax" name? Because original name, ITIGIC (Improved Type Inference for Generic Instance Creation), is a very long(stupid) name and the shortened type information looks like a diamond.

Simplified varagrs method invocation

What is it? It just moves a warning about type information for a very specific case where varargs combines with generics in a method signature.

An admitted weaknesses of Java’s generics—you aren’t normally allowed to create an array of a known generic type. For example, this won't compile:

HashMap<String, String>[] arrayHm = new HashMap<>[2];

So when it runs into this circumstance, the compiler cheats and breaks its own rule about the forbidden array of generic type. It throws the warning "unchecked" which is darkly meaning. Oops! Then, dummy developers want to know why their methods are "unchecked"? They need an explanation.

To make things easier for developers and by annotating the method with "@SafeVarargs", the developer essentially asserts that method doesn't perform any unsafe operations. Known issue! ;)

Reference:



[1]. Benjamin J. Evans and Martijn Verburg, “The Well-Grounded Java Developer: Vital techniques of Java 7 and polyglot programming"

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

[Snippet] CSS - Child element overlap parent

I searched from somewhere and found that a lot of people says a basic concept for implementing this feature looks like below: HTML code: <div id="parent">  <div id="child">  </div> </div> And, CSS: #parent{   position: relative;   overflow:hidden; } #child{   position: absolute;   top: -1;   right: -1px; } However, I had a lot of grand-parents in my case and the above code didn't work. Therefore, I needed an alternative. I presumed that my app uses Boostrap and AngularJs, maybe some CSS from them affects mine. I didn't know exactly the problem, but I believed when all CSS is loaded into my browser, I could completely handle it. www.tom-collinson.com I tried to create an example to investigated this problem by Fiddle . Accidentally, I just changed: position: parent; to position: static; for one of parents -> the problem is solved. Look at my code: <div class="modal-body dn-placeholder-parent-positi...

Why Business Rules Engine Matter

"A good DSL minimizes the 'communication gap' between a domain concept and the code that implements it" - Robert C. Martin A Use Case It looks like adopting a new technology is always driven by a business need. The organizations, such as banks, have their own business processes (such as data gathering and document management). These processes are different from others but usually the differences are not big. How do we build a product which can be reused the similar features but still be adaptable with the specific requirements of each bank? Then, the answer is we should have a library/framework. There is an idea that we can implement this library/framework by using a business rules engine. Which has the following benefits: Be able to modify implementation of business domain at runtime (such as XML, CSV) S ource code is more readable for both developers and domain experts. Therefore, source code can be consider it as a document Since Business Rules Engine...

The Evolution of Team Collaboration

I n my point of view, if a team has a good collaboration, team members will achieve the following: To be more effective To make work more enjoyable I have been working for a company for nearly four years as an software developer. Working on various projects from maintaining existing systems to developing a substantial product resulted in me moving to new teams three times. Actually, my most stable team lasted only around three years.  Every time I've moved to a new team, I have a chance to work with new members and a new team culture again. Indeed, I realize that there is a process of developing the team collaboration which gets better time by time. I think it is an evolution ! Phase 1: Poorly collaborate For example, that is when the team members have the following issues: Only work on his/her area of expertise Don't communicate to others Be not confident to take on new challages Don't listen to other members. Subsequently, the team ha...

What the heck is Meteor DDP?

I was using Meteor for my messenger project. I was so curious about the real time connection. I wanted to know how exactly this mechanism works. In this post, I will go through the DDP Specification, an overview of WebSocket, and a simple demo about how to subscribe a publication of Rocket.Chat (containing a DDP server) from an external webpage. At a glance, I knew that Meteor invented a protocol called DDP which uses for handling real time connection. So then, what is DDP? "DDP (Distributed Data Protocol) is the stateful WebSocket protocol that Meteor uses to communicate between the client and the server." [1] All right! Why does DDP matter? "DDP is a standard way to solve the biggest problem facing client-side JavaScript developers: querying a server-side database, sending the results down to the client, and then pushing changes to the client whenever anything changes in the database" . [2] In order to understand deeply the protocol, I decided ...

Why Functional Programming Matter

What issues do we concern when implementing and maintaining systems? One of the most concern is debugging during maintenance: "this code crashed because it observed some unexpected value." Then, it turns out that the ideas of  no side effects  and  immutability , which functional programming promotes, can help. Shared mutable data is the root cause Shared mutable data are read and updated by more than one of the methods. Share mutable data structures make it harder to track changes in different parts of your program. An immutable object is an object that can't change its state after it's instantiated so it can't be affected by the actions of a function. It would be a dream to maintain because we wouldn't have any bad surprises about some object somewhere that unexpectedly modifies a data structure. A new thinking: Declarative programming There are two ways thinking about implementing a system by writing a program. - Imperative programming: has...