Skip to main content

The power of acceptance test


User Story is the place PO gives his ideas about features so that developers are able to know what requirements are. Acceptance tests are these show the most valuable things of the features represented by some specific cases. Usually PO defines them, but not always. Therefore, refining existing acceptance tests – even defining new ones that cover all features of the User Story must be a worth task.

Acceptance test with Given When Then pattern


If we understand what we are going to do, we can complete it by 50%

I have worked with some members those just start implementing the features one by one and from top to down of the User Story description. Be honest, I am the one used to be. What a risky approach! Because it might meet a case that is very easy to miss requirements or needs to re-work after finding any misunderstood things.

I have also worked with some members those accept spending a long time to clarify the User Story. Reading carefully of whole User Story by defining acceptance tests makes us more confident. Having an overview is even more important because it might link to another User Story. And that is really a good way to make the requirements clear. After receiving feedback from PO about updated acceptance tests, it is the appropriate time for implementing if all things are clear.

As a document helps other members easier to do cross-testing

Cross-testing is a task tested by other members - not the one implements the tested feature - in the team. Acceptance tests reduce the time for reading the User Story when doing this task because the pattern "Given When Then" is more readable than the long description. I don't mean reading only acceptance tests is sufficient; of course the person does cross-testing should read whole story carefully.

It's useful for approaching the features with BDD practice and focusing on the most valuable customers’ needs

According to acceptance tests, we easily implement the feature with BDD approach (reference to this post to see how I started practicing BDD with "Given When Then" acceptance test pattern). Focusing on what customer needs should be always a good approach.
Labels:
Reactions:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Why Business Rules Engine?

"A good DSL minimizes the 'communication gap' between a domain concept and the code that implements it" - Robert C. Martin
A Use Case It looks like adopting a new technology is always driven by a business need.

The organizations, such as banks, have their own business processes (such as data gathering and document management). These processes are different from others but usually the differences are not big. How do we build a product which can be reused the similar features but still be adaptable with the specific requirements of each bank? Then, the answer is we should have a library/framework. There is an idea that we can implement this library/framework by using a business rules engine. Which has the following benefits:
Be able to modify implementation of business domain at runtime (such as XML, CSV)Source code is more readable for both developers and domain experts. Therefore, source code can be consider it as a document Sine Business Rules Engines support for Dom…
Post a Comment
Read more

Strategy Design Pattern

For example, I have an program with an Animal abstract class and two sub-classes Dog and Bird. I want to add a new behavior for the class Animal, this is "fly".  Now, I face to two approaches to solve this issue:

1. Adding an abstract method "fly" into the class Animal. Then, I force the sub-classes should be implemented this method, something like:

public abstract class Animal{ //bla bla public abstract void fly(); } public class Bird extends Animal{ //bla bla public void fly(){ System.out.println("Fly high"); } } public class Dog extends Animal{ //bla bla public void fly(){ System.out.println("Cant fly"); } }
2. Creating an interfaces with method "fly" inside. The same issue to abstract class, I force the classes these implement this interface should have a method "fly" inside:

public interface Flyable{ public void fly(); } public class Bird implements Flyable{ //bla bla public void fly(){ System.out.println…
Post a Comment
Read more

Styling Sort Icons Using Font Awesome for Primefaces' Data Table

So far, Primefaces has used image sprites for displaying the sort icons. This leads a problem if we want to make a different style for these icons; for example, I would make the icon "arrow up" more blurry at the first time table loading because I want to highlight the icon "arrow down". I found a way that I can replace these icons to Font Awesome icons.


We will use "CSS Pseudo-classes" to archive it. The hardest thing here is that we should handle displaying icons in different cases. There is a case both "arrow up" and "arrow down" showing and other case is only one of these icons is shown.

.ui-sortable-column-icon.ui-icon.ui-icon-carat-2-n-s { background-image: none; margin-left: 5px; font-size: 1.1666em; position: relative; } .ui-sortable-column-icon.ui-icon.ui-icon-carat-2-n-s:not(.ui-icon-triangle-1-s)::before { content: "\f106"; font-family: "FontAwesome"; position: absolute; t…
Post a Comment
Read more

Attribute 'for' of label component with id xxxx is not defined

I got the warning in the log file when I have used the tag <h:outputLabel> without attribute "for" in xhtml file. It was really polluting my server log files.

The logged information actually makes sense anyway! We could find an answer as the following:

"Having h:outputLabel without a "for" attribute is meaningless. If you are not attaching the label, you should be using h:outputText instead of h:outputLabel."

However, these solutions are not possible just for my situation. Instead of using h:outputText for only displaying text, my team has used h:outputLabel too many places. We were nearly in our release time (next day) so it is quite risky and takes much efforts if we try to correct it. Because the style (with CSS) is already done with h:ouputLabel. The alternative by adding attribute "for" the existing h:outputLabel is not reasonable either. I really need to find another solution.
Fortunately, I came across a way if I change to use p:out…
Post a Comment
Read more

AngularJS - Build a custom validation directive for using multiple emails in textarea

AngularJS already supports the built-in validation with text input with type email. Something simple likes the following:
<input name="input" ng-model="email.text" required="" type="email" /> <span class="error" ng-show="myForm.input.$error.email"> Not valid email!</span>
However, I used a text area and I wanted to enter some email addresses that's saparated by a comma (,). I had a short research and it looked like AngualarJS has not supported this functionality so far. Therefore, I needed to build a custom directive that I could add my own validation functions. My validation was done only on client side, so I used the $validators object.

Note that, there is the $asyncValidators object which handles asynchronous validation, such as making an $http request to the backend.

This is just my implementation on my project. In order to understand that, I supposed you already had experiences with Angular…
5 comments
Read more