Updates to the Scrum Guide - The 5 Scrum Values

This article is available at blog.scrum.org, here I just quote my favorite points and give my comment at the end of this post.

Ken Schwaber and Jeff Sutherland, the creators of Scrum delivered a webinar on their latest update to the Scrum Guide. The update was a simple one, adding the 5 values of Scrum to the Guide:

These values sound easy? Well, there are many misunderstandings and common problems when applying these values. Here are some example:

Value	Misunderstanding	Getting the value right
Commitment	Committing to something that you don’t understand because you are told to by your boss.	Committing yourself to the team and Sprint Goal.
Focus	Focusing on keeping the customer happy	Being focused on the sprint and its goal.
Openness	Telling everyone everything about all your work	Highlighting when you have challenges and problems that are stopping you from success
Respect	Thinking you are helping the team by being a hero	Helping people to learn the things that you are good at and not judging the things that others aren’t good at.
Courage	Even after the decision has been made continuing to push back	Being transparent, but willing to change even if that means accepting that you are wrong, or that your opinion is not the direction that the team is going.

My comment:

I love the value "Focus" the most. I think it is worth the concern that we need to focus on Sprint goals. I just has experience with a project has too much unclear requirements (not really 100% unclear requirements but something like both our customers and our team don't know exact the scope what we are going to do) and limit release time. In some cases, we don't need make all things be perfect, just focus on the most valuable things and improve it later on. Therefore, the below mindset should be kept in mind:

Both $1 million house and $100 million house are house.
Focus on 20% efforts to make 80% result.

Reference:
[1]. https://blog.scrum.org/updates-scrum-guide-5-scrum-values-take-center-stage/

Comments

Why Business Rules Engine?

"A good DSL minimizes the 'communication gap' between a domain concept and the code that implements it" - Robert C. Martin
A Use Case It looks like adopting a new technology is always driven by a business need.

The organizations, such as banks, have their own business processes (such as data gathering and document management). These processes are different from others but usually the differences are not big. How do we build a product which can be reused the similar features but still be adaptable with the specific requirements of each bank? Then, the answer is we should have a library/framework. There is an idea that we can implement this library/framework by using a business rules engine. Which has the following benefits:
Be able to modify implementation of business domain at runtime (such as XML, CSV)Source code is more readable for both developers and domain experts. Therefore, source code can be consider it as a document Sine Business Rules Engines support for Dom…

Strategy Design Pattern

For example, I have an program with an Animal abstract class and two sub-classes Dog and Bird. I want to add a new behavior for the class Animal, this is "fly". Now, I face to two approaches to solve this issue:

1. Adding an abstract method "fly" into the class Animal. Then, I force the sub-classes should be implemented this method, something like:

public abstract class Animal{ //bla bla public abstract void fly(); } public class Bird extends Animal{ //bla bla public void fly(){ System.out.println("Fly high"); } } public class Dog extends Animal{ //bla bla public void fly(){ System.out.println("Cant fly"); } }
2. Creating an interfaces with method "fly" inside. The same issue to abstract class, I force the classes these implement this interface should have a method "fly" inside:

public interface Flyable{ public void fly(); } public class Bird implements Flyable{ //bla bla public void fly(){ System.out.println…

Styling Sort Icons Using Font Awesome for Primefaces' Data Table

So far, Primefaces has used image sprites for displaying the sort icons. This leads a problem if we want to make a different style for these icons; for example, I would make the icon "arrow up" more blurry at the first time table loading because I want to highlight the icon "arrow down". I found a way that I can replace these icons to Font Awesome icons.

We will use "CSS Pseudo-classes" to archive it. The hardest thing here is that we should handle displaying icons in different cases. There is a case both "arrow up" and "arrow down" showing and other case is only one of these icons is shown.

.ui-sortable-column-icon.ui-icon.ui-icon-carat-2-n-s { background-image: none; margin-left: 5px; font-size: 1.1666em; position: relative; } .ui-sortable-column-icon.ui-icon.ui-icon-carat-2-n-s:not(.ui-icon-triangle-1-s)::before { content: "\f106"; font-family: "FontAwesome"; position: absolute; t…

Attribute 'for' of label component with id xxxx is not defined

I got the warning in the log file when I have used the tag <h:outputLabel> without attribute "for" in xhtml file. It was really polluting my server log files.

The logged information actually makes sense anyway! We could find an answer as the following:

"Having h:outputLabel without a "for" attribute is meaningless. If you are not attaching the label, you should be using h:outputText instead of h:outputLabel."

However, these solutions are not possible just for my situation. Instead of using h:outputText for only displaying text, my team has used h:outputLabel too many places. We were nearly in our release time (next day) so it is quite risky and takes much efforts if we try to correct it. Because the style (with CSS) is already done with h:ouputLabel. The alternative by adding attribute "for" the existing h:outputLabel is not reasonable either. I really need to find another solution.
Fortunately, I came across a way if I change to use p:out…

vhandit | Java and Agile

Search This Blog