Skip to main content

Agile Testing - A defense system from my team stories


Today, I love to tell you about my team story about testing. That started from no testing to extreme testing system.

 eXtreme Feedback Devices (https://jenkins.io/blog/2013/09/05/extreme-feedback-lamp-switch-gear-style/)
Guess what? That is really an exciting idea from the picture(no?). These devices can work with Jenkins. Whenever they build a Jenkins job, this system notifies instantly to developers the status of their system.


That is not 100% related to testing but somehow it is like our testing mindset. Because, in my team,  we call our testing system is a defense system :). There is no doubt that it is very hard for us to remember all features of our applications even which is developed for a long time. Like a document, tests help us make sure no features will be lost after changes such as adding new more features, fixing bugs or refactoring code.

That was the reason why we cared much about testing. It was really important for developing apps. Back then, we thought about how to test effectively.
Testing pyramid
The "testing pyramid" points out that basing on the efforts, the agility of detecting bugs and the running time, we chose what types of tests should be more concern. We mainly followed the above priority, unit test was the most concern.

Now, I am going to share about our problems that we already met and what our strategies were in order to overcome them.

Unit Test

We maintained several very old projects that contains no tests. We got a lot of bugs and we tried to fix them but the problem was no one knows these bugs will happen again or not. It looked like a non-stop loop for fixing bugs. Terrible!
Oh no!
That was a reason why we used unit test to make sure we wouldn't see the bugs already fixed again. Day by day, we practiced TDD and tried to improve our unit test a lot. We also used Hamcrest to make our testing code more readable.

Integration Test

In our application architecture, we called integration such as controller which was a place that contained the combination from business logic (be handled at Service layers), managing database (be handled at DAO layers) and user interfaces (UI) events.

Issue with mock at integration layer
With unit test, it makes sense that a layer can mock a tested layer. For example, DAOs is already covered and Services layer just mocks DAOs layer and just focus on testing its logic. We used Mockito to archive that.

However, some time our applications still work wrong even our unit tests are passed. Why? We figured out that the problem came from mocking when we integration a lot of things together. For instances, we have Services call DAOs, we mock DAOs when we test Services. Because we always assume the behavior of DAOs work correctly, we will soon get unexpected problems in Services if the implementation of DAOs is changed.

This issue led us to find a new type of test is more reasonable rather than unit test. We call it integration test. Here we simulated a real environment and work with real data connection instead of mocking.

GUI Test

We used Selenium in order to test behaviors of GUI such as GUI elements' validation and interaction. We faced to a problem that it takes time too much when running in multi-browsers manually. We found Sauce Labs can help us. It can work with Jenkins so we can automatically running our test as we want on cross platforms.

Selenium Grid (http://www.seleniumframework.com/intermediate-tutorial/what-is-selenium-grid/)
However, we met another problems with Sauce Labs that is very hard to match our Selenium browser drivers, our operation system (Window, Linux) versions with Sauce Labs provided options. We found a better way to go that is Selenium Grid. With Selenium Grid, we freely configure our browsers drivers and operation system versions, it has not only the same ability to Sauce Labs but also run faster thanks to local connection. Moreover, it is free. :)

Summary

Tests are very important for us to develop our applications. It likes our document and defense system. We should try to test as much as possible to reduce bugs and improve our products quality.

Yeah, that is all from my story. What about yours?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The HelloWorld example of JSF 2.2 with Myfaces

I just did by myself create a very simple app "HelloWorld" of JSF 2.2 with a concrete implementation Myfaces that we can use it later on for our further JSF trying out. I attached the source code link at the end part. Just follow these steps below: 1. Create a Maven project in Eclipse (Kepler) with a simple Java web application archetype "maven-archetype-webapp". Maven should be the best choice for managing the dependencies , so far. JSF is a web framework that is the reason why I chose the mentioned archetype for my example. 2. Import dependencies for JSF implementation - Myfaces (v2.2.10) into file pom.xml . The following code that is easy to find from  http://mvnrepository.com/  with key words "myfaces". <dependency> <groupId>org.apache.myfaces.core</groupId> <artifactId>myfaces-api</artifactId> <version>2.2.10</version> </dependency> <dependency> <groupId>org.apache.myfaces.core<

Regex - Check a text without special characters but German, French

Special characters such as square brackets ([ ]) can cause an exception " java.util.regex.PatternSyntaxException " or something like this if we don't handle them correctly. I had met this issue. In my case, my customers want our application should allow some characters in German and French even not allow some special characters. The solution is that we limit the allowed characters by showing the validation message on GUI. For an instance, the message looks like the following: "This field can't contain any special characters; only letters, numbers, underscores (_), spaces and single quotes (') are allowed." I used Regular Expression to check it. For entering Germany and French, I actually don't have this type of keyboard, so I referred these sites: * German characters: http://german.typeit.org/ * French characters: http://french.typeit.org/ Here is my code: package vn.nvanhuong.practice; import java.util.regex.Matcher; import java.util

PSMDB - A MongoDB alternative for having Encryption At Rest

Encryption is the most popular tool for securing data both in transit and at rest. - For protecting data in transit, we can configure to use the TLS connection - For protecting data at rest, we can use Percona Server for MongoDB (PSMDB), an open-source alternative for MongoDB Enterprise. License PSMDB Docker images follow the SSPL license. Therefore, it is not a problem when I only have my containers deployed in on-premises environments. Running MongoDB Replication on OpenShift I have successfully installed the replication by following the guide Install Percona Server for MongoDB on OpenShift . In order to make it work properly with my needs, I disabled some features from the default deployment. See the detail in this change Basically, I needed to create a CRD (Custom Resource Definition) to let OpenShift/Kubernetes what PSMDB is. Then, I deployed the Operator pod. Finally, I deployed the PSMDB StatefulSet. I used NFS shares for Persistent Volumes. Create CRD for PSMDB 2 git clone http

DevOps for Dummies

Everyone talks about it, but not everyone knows what it is. Why DevOps? In general, whenever an organization adopts any new technology, methodology, or approach, that adoption has to be driven by a business need. Any kind of system that need rapid delivery of innovation requires DevOps (development and operations). Why? DevOps requires mechanisms to get fast feedback from all the stakeholders in the software application that's being delivered. DevOps approaches to reduce waste and rework and to shift resources to higher-value activities. DevOps aims to deliver value (of organization or project) faster and more efficiently. DevOps Capabilities The capabilities that make up DevOps are a broad set that span the software delivery life cycle. The following picture is a reference architecture which provides a template of a proven solution by using a set of preferred methods and capabilities. My Remarks Okay, that sounds cool. What does it simply mean, again? The f

JSF 2 - Dynamically manipulating the component tree with system events

Let's suppose we want to modify the metadata (attributes)  of elements such as render , requried , maxlength but we do not define in JSF tags. The manipulating components can be conducted in Drools  files, for example. How could we do? I think that is what we need to change something of component tree during JSF life-cycle. JSF supports event handling throughout the JSF life-cycle. In this post, I use two events: postAddToView for scanning components tree and preRenderView for manipulating the meta of components before rendering to GUI. I modified my own project from previous post for this example. This is my first further JSF trying out with the project as I said before. :) We define the tags f:event below the form - a container component of the components which we want to work on. The valid values for the attribute type for f:event can be found from tag library document  of JSF 2. <!DOCTYPE html> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns: